ANALISIS PEMILIHAN EMERGENCY GENERATOR SEBAGAI SUMBER LISTRIK CADANGAN PADA STASIUN PENGISIAN BAHAN BAKAR TENTARA NASIONAL INDONESIA (SPBT) DI AKADEMI TNI ANGKATAN LAUT

Authors

  • Wujud Wiyono Politeknik Angkatan Laut
  • Raihan Diva Paundra Akademi TNI Angkatan Laut

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59447/engment.v3i1.205

Keywords:

Emergency Generator, Backup Power System, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuel Filling Station (SPBT), Naval Academy, Decision Making

Abstract

The availability of a reliable backup power source is essential for supporting the operational continuity of the Indonesian National Army Fuel Filling Station (SPBT) at the Naval Academy (AAL). Interruptions in the main electrical supply can disrupt fuel distribution activities and reduce operational readiness. This study aims to determine the most appropriate emergency generator as a backup power source for SPBT AAL using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Data were collected through observations, interviews, documentation, and questionnaires administered to experts with competencies in electrical systems and operational management. The evaluation was based on three criteria: purchase cost, spare parts availability, and ease of maintenance. Five generator alternatives were assessed, namely Cummins C10D6, Yanmar YTG10S, Traknus PL15P-SS, Honda EM10000, and Yamaha EF12000E. The results indicate that ease of maintenance is the most influential criterion with a priority weight of 0.627, followed by spare parts availability at 0.280 and purchase cost at 0.094. The global priority ranking shows that Yanmar YTG10S achieved the highest score of 0.438, making it the most suitable emergency generator for SPBT AAL. Furthermore, the consistency ratio (CR) values were below 0.10, indicating that the respondents’ judgments were consistent and that the results are valid for decision-making purposes.

References

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dorf, R. C. (2018). The Electrical Engineering Handbook (6th ed.). CRC Press.

Hidayat, T., & Wibowo, E. (2020). Penentuan prioritas pemeliharaan peralatan listrik menggunakan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process. Jurnal Teknologi Elektro, 19(3), 155–163.

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 8528-1: Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine Driven Alternating Current Generating Sets—Part 1: Application, Ratings and Performance. ISO.

Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336–14345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143

Kurniawan, R., Nugroho, A., & Suryadi, S. (2022). Analisis pemilihan genset sebagai sumber daya cadangan menggunakan metode AHP. Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri, 11(1), 45–54.

Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A. R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., & Bansal, R. C. (2017). A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 596–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191

Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576050310503367

Prasetyo, H., & Sutopo, W. (2021). Penerapan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dalam pemilihan pemasok pada industri manufaktur. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 22(2), 115–124.

Pabla, A. S. (2017). Electric Power Distribution (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Patel, M. R. (2019). Electrical Power Systems: Design and Analysis (3rd ed.). CRC Press.

Rahman, A., Siregar, H., & Putra, M. (2023). Evaluasi keandalan sistem tenaga listrik cadangan pada fasilitas strategis menggunakan pendekatan AHP. Jurnal Energi dan Kelistrikan, 15(1), 12–21.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Saputra, D., & Yulianto, A. (2021). Analisis pengambilan keputusan multikriteria pada sistem kelistrikan menggunakan metode AHP. Jurnal Teknik Energi, 17(2), 89–98.

Stevenson, W. D. (2018). Elements of Power System Analysis (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Tompkins, J. A., White, J. A., Bozer, Y. A., & Tanchoco, J. M. A. (2019). Facilities Planning (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Wood, A. J., Wollenberg, B. F., & Sheblé, G. B. (2019). Power Generation, Operation, and Control (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Wang, J. J., Jing, Y. Y., Zhang, C. F., & Zhao, J. H. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9), 2263–2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Wiyono, W., & Paundra, R. D. (2026). ANALISIS PEMILIHAN EMERGENCY GENERATOR SEBAGAI SUMBER LISTRIK CADANGAN PADA STASIUN PENGISIAN BAHAN BAKAR TENTARA NASIONAL INDONESIA (SPBT) DI AKADEMI TNI ANGKATAN LAUT. Engineering and Maritime Technology Journal (Engment), 3(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.59447/engment.v3i1.205

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>